Proponents for allowing government officials to have backdoors to encrypted communications need to read Franz Kafka. Nearly a century ago, Kafka deftly captured the irony at the heart of their argument in his short story, “The Burrow.”
After the Paris attacks, national security proponents in the US and abroad have been making even more vigorous attempts to mandate a backdoor to encryption.
This post is part of a post series where we round up some of the interesting news and resources we’re finding.For a PDF version of this post, and for archived issues of previous posts, click here. We cover health issues in a separate post.
In a recent report, MIT security experts critiqued calls by government law enforcement for backdoor access to encrypted information. As the experts aptly stated:
“Political and law enforcement leaders in the United States and the United Kingdom have called for Internet systems to be redesigned to ensure government access to information — even encrypted information. They argue that the growing use of encryption will neutralize their investigative capabilities. They propose that data storage and communications systems must be designed for exceptional access by law enforcement agencies. These proposals are unworkable in practice, raise enormous legal and ethical questions, and would undo progress on security at a time when Internet vulnerabilities are causing extreme economic harm.”
According to a survey commissioned by Thales e-Security, the use of encryption by organizations is increasing. Ten years ago, only 15% had an enterprise-wide encryption strategy. Now, 36% have such a strategy.
Some other interesting findings from the survey also found, according to a ZDNet article: