Here’s a new cartoon on technology, privacy, and manipulation. Enjoy!
Webinar – HIPAA and Health Privacy: New Developments
If you couldn’t make it to my recent webinar on HIPAA and health privacy developments in 2023, you can watch the replay here. I had a great discussion with Deborah Gersh, Adam Greene, and
Does European Privacy Law Need a Fix?
I recently had a terrific discussion with Prof. Nikolaus Forgó from the University of Vienna. We talked about my two recent paper — on informed consent and on sensitive data. You can watch the interview on YouTube above. Both articles are available for free download below.
Webinar – Privacy in 2023: New Developments
If you couldn’t make it to my recent webinar on privacy developments in 2023, you can watch the replay here. I had a great discussion with Omer Tene, Kenesa Ahmad, Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna, and Rob Corbet.
Event at U. Virginia Law – Examining Citron’s Book, THE FIGHT FOR PRIVACY
On Monday, February 20, 2023, I will be speaking in an event at the University of Virginia School of Law to discuss Professor Danielle Citron’s new book, The Fight for Privacy: Protecting Dignity, Identity and Love in the Digital Age, which makes the case for understanding intimate privacy as a civil and human right. This is an in-person event. You can find more information here.
February 20, 2023, 4:00 pm – 5:30 pm
University of Virginia
Purcell Reading Room
Speakers will include:
Danielle Citron, University of Virginia
Anita L. Allen, University of Pennsylvania
Ari E. Waldman, Northeastern University
Moderated by Deborah Hellman, University of Virginia.
UPDATE: The event is now concluded, and the video of it is here:
ALSO OF INTEREST:
Watch the video of my recorded webinar, The Fight for Privacy in a Post-Dobbs World, where I discuss issues in Danielle’s book with Danielle Citron, Mary Anne Franks, Jolynn Dellinger, Elizabeth Joh, and Allyson Haynes Stuart.
How to Pursue a Career as a Law Professor
In this event, GW faculty members and GW alumni who are law professors provide advice on pursuing a career in legal academia. Watch the recording here. Details about the event are below.
Thursday, March 2, 2023
4:00 PM – 5:30 PM
Faculty Conference Center, 5th Floor
Webinar – Neurotech and Privacy: The Battle for Your Brain Blog
If you couldn’t make it to my recent webinar on Neurotech and Privacy , you can watch the replay here. I had a great discussion with Nita Farahany, Jules Polonetsky and Ahmed Shaheed AI on the dangers that neurotechnology poses for privacy, fundamental human rights, and freedom of thought.
Also, make sure to order Nita Farahany’s new book, The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology (March 2023).
World Bank Data Privacy Day 2023
I organized the World Bank Data Privacy Day, which was held Wednesday, January 25, 2023 (9 AM – 12:30 PM ET).
The event topics included:
- Data Privacy: Lessons from the Frontier
- Emerging Issues in Algorithms, AI, and Data Analytics
- Current Privacy Issues
Cartoon: Data Privacy Day
A cartoon for Data Privacy Day. In the US, it’s now a week; in the EU, it’s still called Data Privacy Day. I think the cartoon is funnier as a Data Privacy Day cartoon.
I also have a cartoon for last year.
Murky Consent: An Approach to the Fictions of Consent in Privacy Law
I posted a draft of my new article, Murky Consent: An Approach to the Fictions of Consent in Privacy Law. It is just a draft, and I welcome feedback.
You can download it for free here:
Here’s the abstract:
Consent plays a profound role in nearly all privacy laws. As Professor Heidi Hurd aptly said, consent works “moral magic” – it transforms things that would be illegal and immoral into lawful and legitimate activities. Regarding privacy, consent authorizes and legitimizes a wide range of data collection and processing.
There are generally two approaches to consent in privacy law. In the United States, the notice-and-choice approach predominates, where organizations post a notice of their privacy practices and then people are deemed to have consented if they continue to do business with the organization or fail to opt out. In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) uses the express consent approach, where people must voluntarily and affirmatively consent.
Both approaches fail. The evidence of actual consent is non-existent under the notice-and-choice approach. Individuals are often pressured or manipulated, undermining the validity of their consent. The express consent approach also suffers from these problems – people are ill-equipped to make decisions about their privacy, and even experts cannot fully understand what algorithms will do with personal data. Express consent also is highly impractical; it inundates individuals with consent requests from thousands of organizations. Express consent cannot scale.
In this Article, I contend that in most circumstances, privacy consent is fictitious. Privacy law should take a new approach to consent that I call “murky consent.” Traditionally, consent has been binary – an on/off switch – but murky consent exists in the shadowy middle ground between full consent and no consent. Murky consent embraces the fact that consent in privacy is largely a set of fictions and is at best highly dubious.
Abandoning consent entirely in most situations involving privacy would involve the government making most decisions regarding personal data. But this approach would be problematic, as it would involve extensive government control and micromanaging, and it would curtail people’s autonomy. The law should allow space for people’s autonomy over their decisions, even when those decisions are deeply flawed. The law should thus strive to reach a middle ground, providing a sandbox for free play but with strong guardrails to protect against harms.
Because it conceptualizes consent as mostly fictional, murky consent recognizes its lack of legitimacy. To return to Hurd’s analogy, murky consent is consent without magic. Instead of providing extensive legitimacy and power, murky consent should authorize only a very restricted and weak license to use data. This would allow for a degree of individual autonomy but with powerful guardrails to limit exploitative and harmful behavior by the organizations collecting and using personal data. In the Article, I propose some key guardrails to use with murky consent.